Clark paid $250 for a rental list that was outdated at purchase. What amount will he likely receive back upon requesting a refund?

In this scenario, Clark paid $250 for a rental list but discovered that it was outdated at the time of purchase. If the rental list was already known to be outdated, it typically indicates that the product was not as advertised, which could imply a failure to meet consumer expectations or contractual obligations.

Generally, when a product or service fails to meet the described standards or provides value, the consumer is entitled to a full refund. Since Clark purchased a product that was purportedly supposed to be current but turned out to be outdated, he has a strong basis for seeking a complete refund.

As a result, the most logical outcome upon requesting a refund would be for Clark to receive the full amount he initially paid, which is $250. This reflects standard consumer protection practices that aim to ensure that customers are not financially penalized for receiving a product that does not meet advertised standards or needs.